User Tools

Site Tools


spin:esc201_hs2019

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
spin:esc201_hs2019 [2019/12/02 19:39]
stadel [Assignments]
spin:esc201_hs2019 [2019/12/09 14:53]
stadel [Assignments]
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 2. Dec. 2019: {{ :​spin:​sins1-12.pdf |Finite Volume Methods in 1-D and 2-D}} 2. Dec. 2019: {{ :​spin:​sins1-12.pdf |Finite Volume Methods in 1-D and 2-D}}
 +
 +9. Dec. 2019: {{ :​spin:​sins1-13.pdf |2-D Hydrodynamics: ​ Sedov Blast Wave}}
 ====== Assignments ====== ====== Assignments ======
  
Line 97: Line 99:
 9. Design Competition:​ Time-of-Flight Instrument, due ** 24.11.2019 ** 9. Design Competition:​ Time-of-Flight Instrument, due ** 24.11.2019 **
  
-10. Compare Finite Difference Upwind and Corner Transport Upwind (finite volume) in 2-D using a Gaussian on a 2-D periodic mesh. due ** 9.12.2019 **+10. Compare Finite Difference Upwind and Corner Transport Upwind (finite volume) in 2-D using a Gaussian on a 2-D periodic mesh. due ** 8.12.2019 ** 
 + 
 +11. Last exercise: 2-D Sedov Taylor Blast Wave. Define a 2-D **periodic** grid of variables (rho, rho_u, rho_v, E). Set P = e = 1e-5, rho_u = rho_v = 0, and rho = 1.0 everywhere (Note: gamma = 2). Set one cell (either in the corner, or center of the grid) to have e = 1. Adapt the timestep delta_t at each step to satisfy the Courant condition (given by the maximum of D_max across the grid). The timestep should be very small at first and increase with time as the shock wave expands. You should use the corner transport upwind method with the predictor-corrector scheme outlined in the lecture. However, you can make a test using the 2-D basic LAX scheme.
  
spin/esc201_hs2019.txt · Last modified: 2019/12/09 14:53 by stadel